segunda-feira, 3 de agosto de 2015

Comparing good and poor readers' comprehension

COMPARING GOOD AND POOR READERS’ COMPREHENSION
Lucilene Bender de Sousa (PUCRS – Brazil)
Lilian Cristine Hübner (PUCRS – Brazil)


Reading comprehension is a multicomponent process that requires the efficiency of text-based
representation and the construction of a situational model (KINTSCH, 1998). The first highly
relies on word recognition, linguistic knowledge and memory capacity. The second depends
more on world knowledge, integration and inference generation. A good text understanding is
reached  when  readers  are  able  to  represent  the  mainpropositions in memory but also to
integrate the text content to their previous knowledge and experience. This research aims to
investigate  if  good  and  poor  readers’  comprehensiondiffers on text-based representation
and/or  situational  model  by  assessing  their  readingcomprehension through literal and
inferential questions in reading and listening comprehension tasks. The participants were 139
students at the 8th grade of public schools recruited from a group of 336 8th graders. They all
accomplished a reading and a listening comprehension task with 6 texts (3 oral and 3 written)
each followed by 5 multiple choice questions, summing up 30 points, 15 for each tasks. The
groups were classified according to their performance in the reading task: good readers had
scores  at  least  1  standard  deviation  above  the  meanand poor readers at least 1 standard
deviation  below  the  mean.  After  selecting  the  groups,  their  performance  on  literal  and
inferential questions was compared. The comparisonswere done by non-parametric statistical
tests, as the variables were not normally distributed. The results showed that both groups were
better  answering  literal  questions  as  compared  to  inferential  ones  on  reading  (Z  =  -  6,97;
p  =  0,001)  and  on  listening  (Z  =  -2,80;  p  =  0,001) task.  Table  1  presents  the  means  and
standard  deviations  of  the  percentage  of  right  answers  for  each  group.  Good  readers  had
significant better performance in literal and inferential questions.





The  results  seem  to  confirm  the  hypothesis  that  poor  readers  have  difficulty  in  inference
generation.  According  to  Kintsch’s  Construction  Integration  theory,  building  a  coherent
situational model is a complex task and may be  challenging even  for  good readers. On the
other hand, it was surprising that poor readers also have low performance on literal questions,
which reflects problems on text-based representation. This study showed that Brazilian young
readers with low reading ability even after eight  years of formal education still struggle on
basic  reading  processes  as  text-based  representation.  It  also  shows  that  poor  readers  have
difficulty in generating inferences while resolvingreading and listening comprehension tasks.
These results have important educational implications pointing to the necessity of providing
poor readers with instruction on complex as well ason simple reading processes. Moreover,
instruction on inference generation may be extendedto oral text comprehension activities.




REFERENCE
Kintsch,  W.  (1998). Comprehension: a  paradigm  for  cognition.  Cambridge:  Cambridge
University Press.






Trabalho apresentado no 3rd Apoll International Psycholinguistics Congress - anais completos disponível em http://ipcinrio.sciencesconf.org/resource/page/id/18